Climate and Sustainability Shareholder Resolutions Database | Ceres

Review and report on ESG proxy voting (BK, 2015 Resolution)

Industry Capital Markets
Sector Financials
Filed By Daniel Altschuler
Votes %
Status Withdrawn: Strategic
View Memo

Organization: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

Year: 2015

Description: Bank of New York Mellon is a respected leader in the financial services industry with over $1.6 Trillion in AUM and a long track record of responsive service to its investment clients.
 
The Bank publishes an annual Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Report, describing a broad spectrum of policies and programs addressing sustainability concerns. Bank of New York Mellon reports its own greenhouse gas emissions in its CSR Reports and further describes the company’s active role in addressing climate change.
 
Furthermore, Bank of New York Mellon offers socially screened portfolios for clients. In 2012 and 2013 Bank of New York Mellon entities with $754 Billion in assets (48% of total assets) joined the Principles for Responsible Investing (PRI). The number of clients using ESG screening services grew by nearly 26% in 2013.
 
As part of its fiduciary duty, Bank of New York Mellon is responsible for voting proxies of companies in which it holds stock on behalf of clients. However, its proxy voting record seems to ignore its environmental positions and the impact of key environmental factors on shareholder value. We believe a thoughtful fiduciary must carefully review the economic rationale for all proxy initiatives.
 
To the best of our knowledge, Bank of New York Mellon uniformly votes against most if not all shareholder resolutions on social, environmental and climate change issues, backing management recommendations even when major proxy advisory services, such as ISS, support such resolutions with a clear, economic rationale.  
 
For example, increasingly investors around the world acknowledge the potential for climate change to affect long-term business success. Pension funds, investment management firms and other investors with over $90 trillion in assets under management support the Carbon Disclosure Project, an organization calling on companies to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and reduction plans.
 
In 2013 approximately 150 shareholder resolutions were filed at companies facing a potential, significant business impact from climate change. Many of the resolutions simply asked for more disclosure, noting that thousands of companies globally report on their carbon emissions and steps they are taking to reduce them. Bank of New York Mellon voted against such resolutions, in contrast to investment firms such as Goldman Sachs, Oppenheimer, Alliance Bernstein and Wells Fargo, which voted for many such resolutions.
 
We are disappointed that our proxy voting record does not reflect the company’s own commitment to climate change or other social and environmental factors with the potential to impact long term shareholder value.
 
Resolved;
 
Shareholders request the Board to initiate a review of the Bank’s Proxy Voting Policies, taking into account our fiduciary duty, the Bank’s own corporate responsibility and environmental positions as well as and the fiduciary and economic case for the shareholder resolutions presented. The results of the review conducted at reasonable cost and excluding proprietary information, should be reported to investors by October 2015. 
 
Supporting Statement:
 
This review should help update the Bank’s proxy voting policies.

Resolution Co-Filers