| Industry |
Air Freight & Logistics |
| Sector |
Industrials |
| Filed By |
Boston Trust Walden Company
|
| Votes |
15.88%
|
| Status |
Vote |
| View Memo |
|
Organization: United Parcel Service, Inc.
Year: 2015
Whereas: Whereas: Businesses, like individuals, have a recognized legal right to express opinions to legislators and regulators on public policy matters. We have a strong interest in full disclosure of our company's lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether our company's lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and in the best interests of shareholders and long-term value. Resolved, the shareholders of United Parcel Service ('UPS') request the board authorize the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing: 1. Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications. 2. Payments by UPS used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient. 3. UPS's membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation. 4. Description of the decision making process and oversight by management and the board for making payments described in section 2 above. For purposes of this proposal, a 'grassroots lobbying communication' is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. 'Indirect lobbying' is lobbying engage in by a trade association or other organization of which UPS is a member. Both 'direct and indirect lobbying' and 'grassroots lobbying communications' include efforts at the local, state and federal levels. The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee or other relevant oversight committees of the board and posted on the company's website.
Resolved: Resolved: the shareholders of United Parcel Service ('UPS') request the board authorize the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing: 1. Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications. 2. Payments by UPS used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient. 3. UPS's membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation. 4. Description of the decision making process and oversight by management and the board for making payments described in section 2 above. For purposes of this proposal, a 'grassroots lobbying communication' is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. 'Indirect lobbying' is lobbying engage in by a trade association or other organization of which UPS is a member. Both 'direct and indirect lobbying' and 'grassroots lobbying communications' include efforts at the local, state and federal levels. The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee or other relevant oversight committees of the board and posted on the company's website.
Supporting Statement:Supporting Statement: As shareholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in the use of staff time and corporate funds to influence legislation and regulation both directly and indirectly. We appreciate UPS updating its oversight and disclosure on political spending and lobbying but crucial information on lobbying through trade associations is still secret. UPS spent approximately $20.9 million in 2010 to 2013 on direct federal lobbying activities, according to disclosure reports (Senate Reports). These figures may not include grassroots lobbying to directly influence legislation by mobilizing public support or opposition and do not include lobbying expenditures to influence legislation or regulation in states that do not require disclosure. For example, UPS does not disclose or explain to investors it contributions to the highly controversial American Exchange Legislative Council (ALEC). UPS sits on ALEC's Private Enterprise Board and made a $25,000 contribution in 2011. Over 50 companies left ALEC in light of controversy regarding its positions including Coca Cola, Dell Computers, General Electric, Johnson & Johnson, McDonalds, Proctor & Gamble and Unilever. Finally, UPS sits on the Board of the Chamber of Commerce, the largest lobbyist spender, which spent over $1 billion lobbying since 1998. Yet UPS does not disclose portions of its trade association payments used for lobbying.